MIKE DAVIS: The Trump DOJ should withdraw its statement of interest in the OpenAI lawsuit

President Donald Trumps Justice Department is the best in modern history — and that is precisely why the MAGA movement must speak up when a proposed policy falls short of the extraordinarily high bar the American people have come to expect of this administration.

The Justice Department recently filed in OpenAIs private lawsuit a "statement of interest of the United States," arguing Big Techs training of massive AI models on copyrighted text constitutes "fair use," largely intended for limited free use of copyrighted materials for educational purposes in classrooms. The Justice Department should withdraw this ill-advised statement.

Essentially, the governments stated position would let Big Tech oligarchs scrape, copy and commercialize every creative work in America without permission or payment. The government claims this unlimited access is essential for national security, warning any restriction risks losing the AI race to China. That argument is un-American and absurd.

FOX NEWS POLL: VOTERS SEE AI REGULATION AS URGENT, RANK SAFEGUARDS AHEAD OF INNOVATION

"We must steal like China to compete against China" is not a principle; it is a surrender of the rule of law. It is especially damaging to the independent creators and conservative media outlets — like Steve Bannons War Room, which bypassed legacy gatekeepers, delivered truth directly to the public, and helped elect President Trump both times. These voices were systematically censored, de-platformed and demonetized by the same Big Tech giants now seeking a free pass to harvest their work. Having largely lost the censorship fight, the left and its Big Tech allies are shifting to theft as the new method of control.

Conservatives have long insisted that any serious AI policy must protect the 4Cs: children, communities, conservatives and creators. The latest DOJ policy position fails those. America must win the global AI competition the American way — through markets that respect property rights, not through government-sanctioned expropriation.

AI HAS AN OPINION AND IT USUALLY LEANS LEFT. YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW ITS AGENDA

Licensing copyrighted material is not a financial burden on an industry spending hundreds of billions annually and enjoying near-limitless capital. Google will still more than thrive if it has to pay — the old-fashioned, American way —the creators it rips off. The creative industry will not survive if Google doesnt pay.

In a free market, businesses pay for the inputs they need. The music industry already operates this way: Spotify, for example, permits bars, restaurants and other venues to entertain their patrons with others music, while the musicians get paid for their work. AI companies can and must do the same.

OPENAI'S SAM ALTMAN WANTS TO NEGOTIATE A 5% STAKE IN COMPANY FOR US IF COMPETITORS AGREE TO KEY PROVISION

President Trump, himself a prolific content creator — as both a bestselling author and television producer — has said it best: "The pioneering spirit of these artists, authors