Radical anti-Trump language riddles California voter guide on high-stakes ballot measure

A California ballot measure on voter identification provides voters with guidance replete with far-left jargon, including a dig at "MAGA billionaires," that has turned heads online.

Proposition 39 is a citizen-led effort, organized by a group called Californians for Voter ID, that submitted 1.3 million signatures in favor of the ballot initiative in March — far outpacing the required nearly 875,000 signatures in order for it to be adopted as a ballot measure.

Californians are slated to vote on the voter ID initiative in November. If approved, it would require a government-issued identification card or number to vote in person or by mail. It would also require election officials to verify U.S. citizenship.

But the language explaining the proposition from those who oppose the measure in the California voters guide has been flagged online for its highly political nature.

SEN MARK WARNER CALLED OUT IN ABC INTERVIEW FOR INACCURATE VOTER ID CLAIMS

Groups that support the initiative are allowed to argue in favor of it on the ballot, while groups opposed are allowed to do the same on the ballot.

"No on Prop. 39," begins the arguments section on the ballot initiative. "This would advance Trumps voter suppression agenda by adding costly, unnecessary barriers that could block eligible California voters, expose personal information to identity theft, and waste hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars."

"Dont let MAGA billionaires decide which voters count. Vote No," it concludes.

Opponents of the measure are listed as the ACLU California Action, Common Cause and the League of Women Voters of California.

INSIDE HOUSE REPUBLICANS' PLAN TO END RUN DEM OPPOSITION AND PASS TRUMP-BACKED VOTER ID

The summary section of the ballot measure in the guide states the expected financial impact should the measure take effect.

"Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements," it says.

A third section titled "What Your Vote Means" also features language describing the ramifications of voting "yes" or "no" on the initiative.

"A YES vote on this measure means: Voters would be required to present additional identifying information to elections officials each time they vote," it says. The voter guide explains that a "no" vote means "[a] voters identity would continue to be established with the voters signature."

Groups advocating in favor of the measure include the Transparency Foundation, Latino American Political Assn, and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

"Yes on Prop. 39 gives California a BIPARTISAN solution for VOTER ID," their argument section says. "Supported by a solid majority of Democratic, Independent and Republican voters. Increases trust and confidence in our elections."

WATCH: BLACK BISHOP CALLS VOTER ID ARGUMENT 'DEEPLY INSULTING' AFTER EXPLOSIVE NONCITIZEN REGISTRATION REPORT

A Pew Research study released in 2025 shows that 83% of Americans bac