SEN TOM COTTON: Democrats say socialism will help. History says it will hurt

Americans are worried about the cost of living — and rightly so. The price of groceries, housing and many everyday necessities rose by roughly 30% under President Biden. While price increases have slowed under Republican leadership, the devastating effects of that inflation remain. Democrats' self-described "socialist" solution — a dramatic expansion of government welfare, regulation and taxation — would make life even more expensive for American families.

History has already run this big government socialist experiment again and again. From Venezuela to Cuba to the Soviet Union, countries that embraced socialism have produced the same results: shortages, inflation, declining investment, fewer opportunities and higher prices for their citizens.

First, look at Venezuela, which has some of the world's largest oil reserves. Venezuela should have been among the wealthiest nations in the Western Hemisphere, but decades of socialist policies — such as nationalizing industry, reckless government spending and sweeping price controls — have devastated its economy, destroyed the currency and skyrocketed inflation.

I WATCHED CHICAGO PROMISE FOOD EQUITY. NOW MY NEIGHBORHOOD HAS EMPTY SHELVES

For years, Venezuelans have paid the price for these failed socialist policies as grocery shelves emptied, basic medicines disappeared and hourslong lines formed for staples like flour and rice. Toilet paper became so scarce that it became an international symbol of Venezuela's collapse. And because of inflation, a loaf of bread that once cost only a few bolívars eventually cost millions.

Also consider Cuba, where state ownership and central planning have similarly failed to generate prosperity and provide food for its people, despite having fertile agricultural lands. More than six decades after the communist revolution, Cuba imports as much as 80% of its food, yet Cubans still endure chronic shortages. Ration books remain part of daily life. Buildings crumble. Young people leave whenever they can. Even basic household necessities often require standing in long lines or having personal connections to obtain.

And in the Soviet Union, citizens living behind the Iron Curtain grew accustomed to empty shelves, endless waiting lists and chronic shortages of everything, including butter, meat, shoes, coffee, household appliances and automobiles. Sure, the government-controlled Soviet economy could build shoddy tanks and missiles, but it struggled to provide decent housing, quality consumer goods and reliable food supplies. Bureaucrats simply could not replace the countless daily decisions made by millions of producers, workers, entrepreneurs and consumers operating in competitive markets. The problem wasn't bad management. It was the centralized, top-down system itself.

The lesson is clear: socialism doesn't eliminate scarcity. It creates it. While supporters of socialism often blame sanctions or embargoes for these struggles, in reality, these consequences are the result of socialist policies that never work and always fail.

CAPITALISM IS ABOUT INCENTIVES. STOPPING THE STUPIDITY OF SOCIALISM IS A BIG INCENTIVE

Some also point to Scandinavia as proof the socialist model can succeed. But Denmark,

• Share on: